\n<\/p>\n
The two leading candidates to become the next Republican speaker of the House worked the phones and the halls of the Capitol on Thursday, vying for support from within their party\u2019s fractured ranks as the chamber remained in a state of paralysis after the ouster of Representative Kevin McCarthy of California.<\/p>\n
Representatives Steve Scalise, the majority leader, and Jim Jordan, the Judiciary Committee chairman, had each landed more than a dozen endorsements by the afternoon as they raced toward a vote of Republicans tentatively scheduled for Tuesday. An election on the House floor could follow the next day, though the process could stretch much longer if no consensus can be reached.<\/p>\n
Then early Friday, former President Donald J. Trump, whose far-right acolytes in Congress helped lead the rebellion that has plunged the House into chaos, weighed in.<\/p>\n
\u201cCongressman Jim Jordan has been a STAR long before making his very successful journey to Washington, D.C.,\u201d Mr. Trump wrote in a Truth Social message<\/a> that was posted at 12:13 a.m. on Friday. \u201cHe will be a GREAT Speaker of the House, & has my Complete & Total Endorsement!\u201d <\/p>\n Mr. Trump\u2019s post does not mention Mr. Scalise, but Representative Troy Nehls of Texas said on <\/span>X, formerly Twitter, that he had spoken with Mr. Trump and that the former president was indeed <\/span>endorsing Mr. Jordan<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cI believe Congress should listen to the leader of our party,\u201d Mr. Nehls added. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Earlier, Mr. Jordan also picked up an important G.O.P. backer and cleared a potential challenger from the field with the endorsement of Representative Byron Donalds of Florida, who had previously been exploring his own run for speaker, according to a person familiar with his calls to lawmakers. Mr. Donalds said on the social media site X that Mr. Jordan \u201chas my full support to become the next Speaker of the House!\u201d<\/p>\n Both Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan are faced with the difficult challenge of attempting to unite a fractious Republican conference that is reeling after Mr. McCarthy\u2019s removal from the speakership.<\/p>\n For Mr. Jordan, an Ohioan and co-founder of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, the task will be to convince more mainstream Republicans that he can govern and not simply tear things down. He met on Thursday with members of the Main Street Caucus, a group of business-minded Republicans.<\/p>\n For Mr. Scalise, a Louisianian who has won conference elections before as majority leader, the challenge will be to stay one step ahead of Mr. Jordan, and make better inroads with the right wing of the party.<\/p>\n Both men are considered further to the right than Mr. McCarthy, a point that Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida, who led the drive to oust Mr. McCarthy, has noted with a sense of satisfaction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u201cIf it\u2019s Speaker Jim Jordan or Speaker Steve Scalise, there will be very few conservatives in the country who don\u2019t see that as a monumental upgrade over Speaker McCarthy,\u201d Mr. Gaetz said on Newsmax.<\/p>\n Some right-wing Republicans had been encouraging Mr. Trump to make a run for speaker himself, though the party\u2019s current conference rules<\/a> would block him from doing so because he is under multiple felony indictments and facing the possibility of significant prison time. <\/p>\n Speaking Wednesday outside a Manhattan courthouse where he is facing a civil fraud case, Mr. Trump seemed to enjoy dangling the possibility of a run for speaker, telling reporters: \u201cLot of people have been calling me about speaker. All I can say is we\u2019ll do whatever is best for the country and for the Republican Party.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIf I can help them during the process,\u201d he added, \u201cI\u2019ll do it.\u201d<\/p>\n Back in the halls of the Congress, a serious race was taking shape.<\/p>\n Mr. Scalise, who has been in leadership since 2014, has built relationships across the Republican conference. He has been quietly securing commitments through one-on-one calls with members.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n On such calls seeking support, Mr. Scalise has emphasized that he is second only to Mr. McCarthy in fund-raising prowess, and he has locked up a string of commitments from the South and the Midwest, according to a person familiar with his private calls, who described them on the condition of anonymity.<\/p>\n \u201cNot only is Steve a principled conservative, he has overcome adversity far beyond the infighting in our conference right now,\u201d said Representative Ashley Hinson of Iowa, who endorsed Mr. Scalise after speaking with him.<\/p>\n One clear point of contrast between Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan is their dueling positions on continued aid to Ukraine for its war against Russian aggression, which has become increasingly politicized and is now regarded by many Republicans as toxic<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mr. Jordan was one of 117 Republicans who voted last week against continuing a program to train and equip Ukrainian troops, while Mr. Scalise sided with 101 Republicans in supporting it.<\/p>\n \u201cWhy should we be sending American tax dollars to Ukraine when we don\u2019t even know what the goal is?\u201d Mr. Jordan said Thursday on Fox News. \u201cNo one can tell me what the objective is.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Several Republicans said they were waiting to hear more from the candidates before deciding whom to support.<\/p>\n Representative Marc Molinaro of New York said he had spoken with both Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan by phone.<\/p>\n \u201cThere really wasn\u2019t any one person in Congress who worked harder to help me get to Congress or to earn my support than Kevin McCarthy,\u201d Mr. Molinaro said.<\/p>\n \u201cWe now have individuals who have a week,\u201d he added. \u201cAnd so I\u2019m going to observe, I\u2019m going to listen, and I\u2019m going to demand that members like me and the people we represent have a seat at the table, and then make a decision.\u201d<\/p>\n Robert Jimison contributed reporting.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n